Archive for January, 2010

WestlawNext. Where’s the Beef?

Reuters has been claiming that it’s “next gen” product WestlawNext will practically do your research for you, and as you know monopolies like Westlaw are famous for truthfulness so I don’t see why we shouldn’t trust them. Do you?

For instance, check out the above video. I couldn’t help noticing that there is nothing substantive in it, or in any of the company’s other marketing pieces for this product. Not the slightest attempt to tell me why this bill of goods is any better than the last one. Come on Westlaw. How do you look yourself in the eyes every morning? Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice … and I won’t buy your bullshit anymore. How about asking lawyers what they really need for a change instead of selling high-priced hot air? In short, I say #fail.

Posted via web from practice (redux)

What We Learned About Apple Yesterday

In this surprisingly insightful article on Mashabl the author reminds us that Apple is out for profit (it’s a company, not a religion) and has a definite strategy with its iPad product. My favorite quote is this one

We learned about Apple and its plans mostly from the things the iPad is missing. … Apple didn’t omit a camera or multitasking by accident … They’ve omitted all these things on purpose [and that] tells you more about Apple’s plans than the things they did put in.

It may seem self-evident, but it doesn’t hurt to step back from the brink everyone once in a while and remember that companies can make money by  making amazing products. It’s just that most don’t. I hope Apple continues doing it though.

Posted via email from practice (redux)

31

01 2010

Apple iPad: A Revolution in Parody Inspiration

31

01 2010

RSS is Listening

No serious intent here. Just thought the image was beautiful.

Posted via email from practice (redux)

30

01 2010

And Microsoft Goes Down Hard …

For the 16th straight Quarter Microsoft has pissed away its money supporting online ventures like Bing! In the process Microsoft has also qualified for the Olympic predatory pricing event and is a favorite to take the Gold. By losing $2 Billion a year in order to take 3% of the search market away from Google Microsoft has to know that it’s time to quit. Right?

Read the full article at Silicon Alley Insider.

Posted via email from practice (redux)

30

01 2010

Google Twitter Directory

Here is a list of all Google’s Twitter identities. Who knew they had so many? Still, good to know.

Posted via email from practice (redux)

30

01 2010