Archive for September, 2010

In re Mateyko/ExpressDrop v. Mateyko

In re John R. Mateyko, 08-32684
ExpressDrop v. Mateyko, 09-00718

Issued: September 27, 2010
By:  Hon. Jacqueline P. Cox

To view the opinion in .pdf format click here.

Posted via email from beyond bankruptcy

28

09 2010

Amended Ch. 13 Model Plan

The Model Chapter 13 Plan used by the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois has been amended. 

The updated Model Plan can be found hereUse of the updated Model Plan is mandatory beginning October 15, 2010.

Intrepid souls may begin using the updated Model Chapter 13 Plan immediately, however. Good luck with that.

Posted via email from beyond bankruptcy

23

09 2010

In re Wiszniewski, 09-11102/Merritt v. Wiszniewski, 09-00524

Bankruptcy: In re Leszek D. Wiszniewski, 09-11102
Adversary: Valerie Merritt v. Wiszniewski,  09-00524

Opinion Issued August 31, 2010
Judge: Susan Pierson Sonderby

View the opinion in .pdf format by clicking here.

Posted via email from beyond bankruptcy

23

09 2010

In re Signore/Kafantaris v. Signore

Bankruptcy: In re Edward and Kanella Signore,   09-13534
Adversary: James Kafantaris v Kanella Signore, 09-00667
Issued on: Sept. 17, 2010
Judge: Jacqueline P. Cox

Click here to view the Opinion relating to the Motion to Strike (.pdf format)
Click here to view the Opinion re the Motion for Summary Judgment (.pdf format)

Posted via email from beyond bankruptcy

22

09 2010

In re Vito O. Roppo, 09 B 37273

In re Vito O. Roppo, 09 B 37273
Opinion Sept. 16, 2010
Judge: John H. Squires

To view the opinion in PDF format click here.

Posted via email from beyond bankruptcy

22

09 2010

Case Updates from Findlaw

6th Circuit
 
Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. Anderson Senior Living Prop., LLC. 
Appeal from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's (BAP) grant of debtors' motion to dismiss as moot per Sec. 363(m) plaintiffs' appeal from bankruptcy court's authorization of the sale of debtors' interests in co-owned properties as well as undivided interests of tenants in common (TIC) is affirmed. BAP properly determined that 363(m) moots the appeal – even though the bankruptcy court approved the sale of the TIC property interests pursuant to section 363(h), the debtors ultimately sold the properties pursuant to section 363(b) and that sale was never stayed. Read more…

8th Circuit


US v. Ritchie Special Cred. Invs., Ltd.
 
In intervenor's application to intervene in adversary proceeding initiated by the government pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1345 against alleged author of a Ponzi scheme, denial of application is affirmed where: 1) litigation progressed substantially between the initiation of proceedings and intervenor's second motion to intervene; and 2) intervenor had knowledge of all the facts surrounding the district court's injunction, and failed to take issue with it when first presented with an opportunity to do so. Read more…

Ritchie Special Cred. Invs., Ltd. v. US Trustee 
In a creditor's objection to the appointment of a bankruptcy trustee, arguing that the trustee did not qualify as a “disinterested person” as required by 11 U.S.C. 1104(d), the denial of the objection is affirmed where: 1) bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the trustee's role and interests as a receiver did not predispose him towards forfeiture or amount to a disqualifying material adverse interest; and 2) there was no abuse of discretion in the bankruptcy court’s determination that creditor failed to show that it would be prejudiced by the trustee's appointment as trustee in the jointly administered estates. Read more… 

Posted via email from beyond bankruptcy

04

09 2010