<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>practicehacker &#187; 09-0412</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.practicehacker.com/tag/09-0412/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.practicehacker.com</link>
	<description>tools, tips, and tech for small firms and solos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Opinion: Zelotes v. Rousseau (Total Attorneys Case)</title>
		<link>http://www.practicehacker.com/2010/02/09/opinion-zelotes-v-rousseau-total-attorneys-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.practicehacker.com/2010/02/09/opinion-zelotes-v-rousseau-total-attorneys-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>practicehacker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts and]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current-events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal marketplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practice management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referrals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[09-0412]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1st Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer referral service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Total Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zelotes v. Rousseau]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicehacker.com/2010/02/09/opinion-zelotes-v-rousseau-total-attorneys-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Download now or preview on posterous Zelotes v Rousseau et al 09-0412 Memorandum of Decision.pdf (497 KB) At issue in this case was whether Chicago-based lead-generation service Total Attorneys was violating ethical rules by doing business Lawyers in the State of Connecticut. The answer apparently was no. At least, not based on the complaint brought [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.practicehacker.com/2010/02/09/opinion-zelotes-v-rousseau-total-attorneys-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

